Good Intentions Are Not Enough
Home
May 20, 2009
Charity Ratings Based on Administration Costs can do More Harm Than Good
This post has been moved to Good Intentions' new website.
Click here
to read the post.
May 20, 2009 8:55:32 PM
|
Choosing a charity
NEXT POST
Good Intentions are Not Enough
This post has been moved to Good Intentions' new website. Click here to read the post.
PREVIOUS POST
Hamburgers for Hindus
This post has been moved to Good Intentions' new website. Click here to read the post.
Saundra
1
Following
1
Followers
Search
My Other Accounts
Twitter
|
Good_Intents
Recent Comments
Outdoor Playground Equipment:
Its disgusting that this is even an issue, this...
|
more »
On
Placing children in orphanages or up for adoption can be a lucrative trade
Mwritenour:
I applaud your efforts, but am aware of the hug...
|
more »
On
My Smart Aid Wishlist
Sean:
Fantastic article on this here (from February 2...
|
more »
On
Don't Choose a Charity Based on Administration Costs
Generally I think it would not. You have the chance to get over from miss manage non profit organizations.
Posted by: leonel curry | May 01, 2010 at 03:07 PM
Focusing only on administrative costs is probably not a reasonable criterion for judging a charity, but as simple as the star system may be, most potential donors are not savvy enough to parse the 990s that charities must file. As a veteran of the fundraising field, I try to distinguish between administrative costs and the cost of fundraising; in other words, when a non-profit pays 50, 60, or even 90 cents to raise a dollar, something is wrong. Also, check the 990 to see what they pay their executives or trustees. souls4souls (collects and distributes shoes) pays their founder and CEO $400,000, way too much. It's worth the effort to ensure that you are not being defrauded by dishonest charities designed to enrich fundraising/telemarketing firms.
Posted by: Dwight Hatcher | January 21, 2010 at 05:36 AM
Unfortunately there is not a lot of recourse. I'd recommend you start with the Better Business Bureau. They have a section for US registered non-profits where you can lodge a complaint. They will take the complaint to the aid agency and then record whether or not they properly respond to the complaint.
Here's BBB's charity link http://www.bbb.org/us/Charity-Complaints/
Good luck
Saundra
Posted by: Saundra | June 11, 2009 at 06:47 PM
One correction to my recent post should read "I am not familiar with the rules regulating 501-c3s".
Posted by: S Fagan | May 29, 2009 at 11:56 AM
I have worked for several small non-profits and have friends and family who have worked for others. I agree that the largest criteria for rating any non-profit should be the transparency of the company at all levels. Detailed financials, board member names and relationship to director/managers of the agency and the final listing should show the pay/compensation of each employee.
One company I worked for for almost 8 years now has a director who runs the company like his own personal fiefdom, where the board members are all friends and family and through that he controls his pay and compensation. Another non-profit of which I am familiar has a director and a limited staff which includes the director's wife in a "token" position. Since the company was founded about 10 years ago, the board has increased the director's salary from a low five-figure salary to a mid-six-figure annual salary. At the same time, board members have received six-figure loans from the non-profit. I am familiar with the rules regulating 501-c3s and other non-profits, but I have to think that most of these practices are not acceptable. Is there any procedure by which a "non-profit" can have that status revoked and is there an agency responsible for such monitoring?
Posted by: S Fagan | May 29, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Dear Ken,
Thanks for your comment. I have often thought about how to best rate aid agencies and know how truly difficult it is.
I'm glad to know you're on the road to a more comprehensive matrix and look forward to seeing what you develop.
Posted by: Saundra Schimmelpfennig | May 22, 2009 at 01:59 PM
A major worry we have at Charity Navigator is that, without a performance/outcome measurement system within a nonprofit, they may do more harm than good. We are developing a system for our own internal operations and we hope that all nonprofits develop a sense of urgency to get this done.
In addition, in our view, to make a wise giving decision a social investor (donor with their eyes open) needs to consider three components of a nonprofit - financial health, accountability/transprarency & outcomes. We are working on developing a system of rating charities that encompasses all three components. I actually do sleep at night because we are on the road to more comprehensively capture these elements. We also will be re-examining our existing financial metrics to see how they might be strengthened. We welcome your feedback.
Posted by: Ken Berger | May 22, 2009 at 08:56 AM